Tuesday, September 22, 2009

There Are No Villains in Financial Crises

I think it's combination of bad information and in the back of their minds knowing 'Uncle Sugar' would bail them out. - MBC

http://meganmcardle.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/09/there_are_no_villains_in_finan.php

"... Tyler Cowen points to some evidence that banker pay wasn't at fault, either:

This "executive compensation" theory of the crisis is now the keystone of the conventional wisdom, having been embraced by President Obama, the leaders of France and Germany, and virtually the entire financial press. But if anyone has evidence for the executive-compensation thesis, they have yet to produce it. It's a great theory. It "makes sense"--we all know how greedy bankers are! But is it true?

The evidence that has been produced suggests that it is false.

For one thing, bankers were often compensated in stock as well as with bonuses, and the value of this stock was wiped out because of the investments in question. Richard Fuld of Lehman Brothers lost $1 billion this way; Sanford Weill of Citigroup lost half that amount. A study by RenĂ© Stulz and RĂ¼diger Fahlenbrach[3] showed that banks with CEOs who held a lot of stock in the bank did worse than banks with CEOs who held less stock, suggesting that the bankers were simply ignorant of the risks their institutions were taking. Journalists' and insiders' books about individual banks[4] bear out this hypothesis: At Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers, for example, the decision makers did not recognize the risks until it was too late, despite their personal investments in the banks' stock...

...All of these papers suggest that the search for a villain behind the crisis will ultimately be fruitless. There are two basic narratives of what happened. The first is that bankers had bad incentives: they took massive risks because the profits were so good in the up years that it was worth the risk of the bad, or because they could pass the risks onto some other sucker, or they thought Uncle Sugar would bail them out. The other narrative is that bankers had bad information: they didn't understand the risks they were taking.

Friday, September 18, 2009

Economic vandalism - Barack Obama and free trade

So much for surrounding himself with sound-minded thinkers. If he doesn't listen or, worse, doesn't understand, makes no difference who he surrounds himself with. - MBC

http://www.economist.com/printedition/displayStory.cfm?Story_ID=14450332

"YOU can be fairly sure that when a government slips an announcement out at nine o’clock on a Friday night, it is not proud of what it is doing. That is one of the only things that makes sense about Barack Obama’s decision to break a commitment he, along with other G20 leaders, reaffirmed last April: to avoid protectionist measures at a time of great economic peril. In every other way the president’s decision to slap a 35% tariff on imported Chinese tyres looks like a colossal blunder, confirming his critics’ worst fears about the president’s inability to stand up to his party’s special interests and stick to the centre ground he promised to occupy in office.

This newspaper endorsed Mr Obama at last year’s election (see article) in part because he had surrounded himself with enough intelligent centrists. We also said that the eventual success of his presidency would be based on two things: resuscitating the world economy; and bringing the new emerging powers into the Western order. He has now hurt both objectives...

...The tyre decision needs to be set into the context of a string of ominously protectionist policies which started within weeks of the inauguration with a nasty set of “Buy America” provisions for public-works contracts. The president watered these down a bit, but was not brave enough to veto. Next, the president stayed silent as Congress shut down a project that was meant to lead to the opening of the border to Mexican trucks, something promised in the NAFTA agreement of 1994. Besides these sins of commission sit the sins of omission: the president has done nothing at all to advance the three free-trade packages that are pending in Congress, with Colombia, Panama and South Korea, three solid American allies who deserve much better. And much more serious than that, because it affects the whole world, is his failure to put anything worthwhile on the table to help revive the moribund Doha round of trade talks. Mr Bush’s tariffs, like the Reagan-era export restraints on Japanese cars and semiconductors, came from a president who was fundamentally committed to free trade. Mr Obama’s, it seems, do not.

America is needed to lead... For Mr Obama now to take up the no-protection cause at the G20’s forthcoming meeting in Pittsburgh would, alas, be laughable. But if America does not set an example, no one else is likely to.

Dumb and dumber

Nor is the potential fallout from Mr Obama’s wrongheaded decision limited to trade. Evidence of a weak president being pushed leftward might cause investors to worry whether he will prove similarly feeble when it comes to reining in the vast deficits he is now racking up; and that might spook the buyers of bonds that finance all those deficits. Looming large among these, of course, are the Chinese. Deteriorating trade relations between the world’s number one debtor and its number one creditor are enough to keep any banker awake at night.

And America needs China for a lot more than T-bonds. Any hope of securing a climate-change agreement at Copenhagen in December on a successor treaty to Kyoto will require close co-operation between America and China. So does the work of negotiating with North Korea on its nuclear weapons. And as for Iran, where America is keen to seek a fresh round of UN sanctions in the hope of forcing it to scrap its nuclear programme, China holds a power of veto at the Security Council. Under the relevant trade laws, Mr Obama had the absolute discretion not to impose the recommended tyre tariffs on the grounds of overall economic interest or national security. Given everything that is at stake, his decision not to exercise it amounts to an act of vandalism.

Thursday, September 17, 2009

The promised bland - Barack Obama marks a year since the collapse of Lehman Brothers with a speech to Wall Street

I'd say The Economist is falling out of love with President Obama - MBC

http://www.economist.com/daily/news/displaystory.cfm?story_id=14444100&fsrc=nwl

"...produced plenty of elegant phrases but little that was new, and quite a bit that was confusing...

...much of what Mr Obama said was disingenuous. He included some helpful words on the responsibility borne by homeowners for taking risks they could not afford. But he also urged banks to bring financial services to those currently outside the financial system, and put the consumer-protection agency first on his list of reforms. He said that the cost of future failures would fall on shareholders and creditors. But it is far from clear that he will force money-market funds, a major source of bank funding, to give up their promise to return their capital to investors intact...

...the casual listener to Mr Obama’s oratory might conclude that the crisis occurred because there were no regulations, that big banks would be allowed to fail in the future and that the proposed constraints of finance will create a new age of prosperity. (They would also think that the incomprehensible decision on Friday to impose tariffs on Chinese tyre imports was designed to save free trade.) The truth is far messier. Reform is badly needed, but people will still be greedy, banks will still need saving and a more stable system will entail less credit flowing through it. Mr Obama is eloquent but too often he does not tell it like it is..."

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Daily Pfenning 9/16/2009

http://www.dailypfennig.com/

"...Retail Sales for August were quite strong, and showed signs that the move was more than the Cash for Clunkers program, and Back to School buying... There are quite a few people/ economists/ analysts out there now jumping on the President's bandwagon that the recession is over based on this report... For those of you at home keeping score, Retail Sales for August printed at +2.7%!...

... wonder if all those people wearing the President endorsed end of the recession rose colored glasses ever stopped to wonder if gas purchases might have helped trump up this figure? Well, I did, you knew I would! And I found that rising gasoline prices sent service station receipts up 5.1% in the month. If we had journalists like we used to have, they would have known to go look at the rising gas price component of the report, since just last week the Trade Deficit jumped by 16% in one month due to rising oil prices...

...
Speaking of the Fed and inflation... David Galland, who writes daily letter regarding the goings on in the world called "Casey's Daily Dispatch", and can be found here: http://www.caseyresearch.com/casey-services/free-publications/caseys-daily-dispatch/ , had this to say yesterday regarding this subject of the Fed and inflation...

"Reason Magazine... current edition, had a couple of items that I thought were especially interesting. Ironic, actually.

The first was about a comic book the Fed has published discussing inflation, as well as defending its autonomy. You can view it by following the link below. What you should find interesting is that they make several clear mistakes in describing inflation – for instance, by saying that if the price of oil goes up, that causes inflation. And on the very first page, they state that “The dictionary defines inflation as a substantial and continuing rise in the general price level.”

But that is not what the dictionary says – every entry I checked always includes “… related to an increase in the volume of money,” or words to that effect. Kind of scary, when the organization charged with fighting inflation doesn’t actually know what it is.

You can read the comic yourself here, straight off the New York Fed’s website. http://ia301540.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.frb.ny.comic.inflation/gov.frb.ny.comic.inflation.pdf

...
The Chinese government has told Chinese companies they do not have to honor derivatives and commodity futures contracts made with Western financial institutions.

What does this do to the institutions that wrote these contracts with China, ... It's going to hurt... And it's going to hurt bad... But, nobody really knows just how many or how much risk is out there... But, if one day you wake up and hear on the news that the financial markets here are melting down once again, you'll be able to say...

...
Big Al Greenspan was back in the news last night... ("In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation. There is no safe store of value." quote by Alan Greenspan, from an article written in 1966 entitled "Gold and Economic Freedom")

Any way... Big Al was back in the news, and said that he's worried that lawmakers will hamper the Fed's efforts to rein in its monetary stimulus, and that inflation might "swamp" the bond market. See, how Big Al is sticking up for the Fed, and putting down the groundwork now, to blame lawmakers when inflation is soaring on the other side of the recession?..."


Misreading the Iranian Situation

George Friedman has been right on so many of these you have to pay attention. - MBC

http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20090915_misreading_iranian_nuclear_situation?utm_source=GWeekly&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=090915&utm_content=GIRtitle

"...the Israelis have Obama in a box. Obama promised them that if Israel did not take a military route, he would deliver them crippling sanctions against Iran. Why Obama made this promise — and he has never denied the Israeli claim that he did — is not fully clear. It did buy him some time, and perhaps he felt he could manage the Russians better than he has. Whatever Obama’s motivations, having failed to deliver, the Israelis can say that they have cooperated with the United States fully, so now they are free by the terms of their understanding with Washington to carry out strikes — something that would necessarily involve the United States...

...When we speak to people in Tehran, Washington and Moscow, we get the sense that they are unaware that the current situation might spin out of control. In Moscow, the scenario is dismissed because the general view is that Obama is weak and inexperienced and is frightened of military confrontation; the assumption is that he will find a way to bring the Israelis under control.

It isn’t clear that Obama can do that, however. The Israelis don’t trust him, and Iran is a core issue for them. The more Obama presses them on settlements the more they are convinced that Washington no longer cares about Israeli interests. And that means they are on their own, but free to act.

It should also be remembered that Obama reads intelligence reports from Moscow, Tehran and Berlin. He knows the consensus about him among foreign leaders, who don’t hold him in high regard. That consensus causes foreign leaders to take risks; it also causes Obama to have an interest in demonstrating that they have misread him.

We are reminded of the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis only in this sense: We get the sense that everyone is misreading everyone else. In the run-up to the Cuban Missile Crisis, the Americans didn’t believe the Soviets would take the risks they did and the Soviets didn’t believe the Americans would react as they did. In this case, the Iranians believe the United States will play its old game and control the Israelis. Washington doesn’t really understand that Netanyahu may see this as the decisive moment. And the Russians believe Netanyahu will be controlled by an Obama afraid of an even broader conflict than he already has on his hands.

The current situation is not as dangerous as the Cuban Missile Crisis was, but it has this in common: Everyone thinks we are on a known roadmap, when in reality, one of the players — Israel — has the ability and interest to redraw the roadmap. Netanyahu has been signaling in many ways that he intends to do just this. Everyone seems to believe he won’t. We aren’t so sure."

Recovery? Middle Class Tax?

This talk now of income tax on middle class sounds foreboding to me. Biden claims we've gone from near depression to recovery from recession. However, Geithner says it's too early to say economy is in recovery. Now Bernanke says recession is 'very likely over' but it won't feel like it. Geez guys, anyone got a firm position on this or are you all just guessing, AGAIN?

And you've got to admire President Obama saying 'the success of organized labor and the American middle class are essential to the future prosperity of the country'...'the revitalization of the U.S. economy depends on better lives for working class Americans...' (Dear Captain Obvious, please tell us what you are doing to make this happen!)

Of course he wouldn't be pandering to the Unions who helped get him elected. - MBC

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jEzYsWgiG-OzwRXulLCZlcXBUoAAD9ANQ1E00

"...On the budget deficits, Geithner said, "I think Americans understand we have an unsustainable fiscal position. We have to bring these deficits down over time." He said the country must "get our fiscal house in order" and stressed that Obama is vehemently opposed to a general income tax increase for people who make under $250,000 a year.

The secretary said that while things are better than they were a year ago, "I would say there's no recovery yet. We define recovery ... as people back to work, people able to get a job again, businesses investing again ....and we're not at that point."

"We're going to do what it takes to get this economy going again," he said. "We're going to look carefully at any sensible program."

Health Care

Has President Obama very effectively cornered Congress and set them up to be scapegoat in coming healthcare reform vote? His speech promised deficit neutrality, which just about everyone agrees is next to impossible, at the same time promising to insure those previously uninsurable due to preexisting expensive diseases.

He's had a lot of beautiful words but been pretty vague on details, leaving Congress to hold the bag and he can stand above and say, "I tried", and blame all kinds of people for why this didn't get passed. He's a very special politician, got to give him that. - MBC

Racism

I am so tired of the race card. Now Jimmy Carter no less is alleging Joe Wilson's outburst was based on racism. It may be outright disrespect but I can't see how racism can even be considered as part of this. David Paterson claiming the troubles he and Deval Patrick have as Governors are based on racism. Come On! This isn't about white people holding black people back or making things especially tough for them. To me it's about people having trouble being what they are and when things get tough they look to blame it on the color of their skin. How small can we go here? - MBC

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Daily Pfennig 9/15/2009

http://www.dailypfennig.com/

"...Today, marks the 1-year anniversary of the Lehman Bros. collapse... What have we learned from that meltdown? Not a darn thing! We're still spending like there's no tomorrow, and we're still willing to bail out some and not others... In the past year though, Gold is up 30%...

Sanction Joe Wilson

Can our Congress become anymore ridiculous (Republican or Democrat)? They'll vote to sanction Joe Wilson but do essentially nothing to Charles Rangel. It's like they are completely devoid of one ounce of moral fiber. - MBC

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/27151.html

"...House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif) called Wilson’s remark “shockingly disrespectful and unacceptable.” “While it is true that the President called his opponents liars, this does not grant others the right to respond in kind. The President represents the entire nation. He speaks for every American. Mr. Wilson’s small, red-neck constituency doesn’t give him the right to challenge the President.” (I wonder if she really said this - MBC)

Monday, September 14, 2009

Daily Pfennig 9-14-2009

http://www.dailypfennig.com/

"...news that pushed yen higher came from the U.S. where the Administration announced a tariff on Chinese tires... Passenger and light truck tires to be exact... This really heats up the trade protectionism between the U.S. and China, folks...

... Back in 2001, the then President Bush, slapped a tariff on Chinese steel...Big Shift in the strong dollar trend that existed then... Now, we have this tariff... What do you think this will do to U.S. / China relations? YIKES!

... If the U.S. Trade Commission was really concerned about the shipments of tires to the U.S. and what they felt to be a displacing of thousands of jobs, why then didn't the Trade Commission work with the U.S. tire companies and work out a price adjustment? Ahhh, grasshopper, that would be too difficult to do! It's far easier to slap tariffs on the one country that has bought your debt year after year, without batting an eye...

... So, could this new tariff be the juice that moves the dollar to the next big leg down?... These things need to work themselves through... Just like in 2001, it took several months before the dollar really began a strong downward trend... But, keep this in the memory bank...

... And China, feeling that they had to retaliate... Announced a probe of U.S. auto, and chicken imports... If you get this going really heated, it could spread throughout the globe, and push all the hard work to get out of the global recession into the dumpster! This is plain stupid! And our Gov't should have known better!

...first bank casualty from the Commercial Real Estate meltdown... Corus Bank in Chicago, is the second largest bank to fail this year, and will cost the government between $1.5 Billion and $2.4 Billion in losses, depending on the performance of the bank's outstanding loans...

...
this time every year, economists meet in Davos, Switzerland, and normally you can get a few thoughts that remind everyone about "what's really going on in the world"...

...Stephen Roach, had this to say... "The American consumer is dead and this is a wake up call for the Chinese & Asian export industry."

...guy from China that's a "think tank" guy... His name is Yu Yongding, and he had this to say... "I have tremendous doubts about US households to finance the budget deficit." and... "Why are people still so confident in the strength of the dollar? It's a myth!"

... Remember... the IMF wanting to issue their own "global currency"? Well... Zhu Min Bank of China had this to say... "IMF should provide stable reserve currency regardless of format. Very volatile reserve currency is difficult for Asia."

The Wall Street Journal had a good story regarding the weak dollar this weekend...WSJ... "The dollar could continue its weeklong decline this week, especially if data on U.S. retail sales show improvement. The dollar hit a nine-month low last week against the euro and a seven-month low against the yen. Investors are moving into higher-yielding currencies such as the yen as the global economic picture brightens."

Saturday, September 12, 2009

Daily Pfenning - 9/11/2009

http://www.dailypfennig.com/

"...Trade Deficit for July, which registered its biggest increase in more than 10 years in July, as surging purchases of oil caused an unprecedented jump in imports. The deficit widened by 16.3%, its largest percentage increase since February 1999, to $31.96 Billion. That's up from the $27.49 Billion Deficit figure in June...

Monthly Budget Statement, read Deficit! Is forecast to print a whopping addition to our already eye-popping Budget Deficit, of $140 Billion! Recall that we all thought last month's deficit of $111 Billion was bad... Well, we'll see your $111 Billion, and raise you $29 Billion!

That's just shameful folks... We, as a country, continue to spend what we don't have, and print money, and do all the stupid things that got us to this place to begin with! Pursuing the same stupid policy of excessive spending, debt expansion and monetary inflation can only compound the problems that prevent the required corrections. Doubling the money supply didn’t work, and neither will any amount of money supply!

I read this somewhere, forgive me but I don't recall where, and it stuck in my head... "Buying up the bad debt of privileged institutions and dumping worthless assets on the American people is morally wrong and economically futile."...


...The Chinese see what we're doing folks... And they don't like it one iota!...

I know, that I've talked about this so many times before that you're tired of hearing about it... But, China is the gate keeper folks... We were stupid enough to get to this place, with all our deficit spending, and now... As my mother used to say... You made your bed, now lay in it!


...Gold is back above $1,000!

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Texas Talk - Government Solutions Lack Understanding

You've got to give it to Ron Paul - he stays focused on some sound beliefs. - MBC

http://www.house.gov/htbin/blog_inc?BLOG,tx14_paul,blog,999,All,Item%20not%20found,ID=090908_3511,TEMPLATE=postingdetail.shtml


"...Throwing money around and creating more government programs is both simplistic and damaging to the economy. Of course, the administration claims that we would have been much worse off without these efforts. You can’t improve this situation by adding to our mountain of public debt for the benefit of big banks and other special interests. The American people know this. When will Washington learn?...

...
plans for healthcare reform – or health insurance reform - are becoming more and more unpopular as details are examined. But because of all the alarmist rhetoric, politicians in Washington feel obligated to pass something, even if it doesn’t help. Rarely are liberty and prosperity at greater risk than when politicians feel they must “do something”. It is frightening to watch Washington toy with our healthcare purely for political reasons...

...
all of these problems and their wrong-headed solutions come from one greater problem - which is not understanding the reasons that we are here. The economy is in bad shape because of too much government intervention producing a myriad of unintended consequences and perverse incentives. Healthcare is broken because the doctor-patient relationship has been broken down by hyper regulation and too much government interference. Afghanistan is a mess because they ignored the mission approved by Congress - to seek out those who attacked us on 9/11. They have instead gotten sidetracked with nebulous interventionist tasks such as promoting democracy and nation building...

The Two Reasons it’s Time to Short U.S. Stocks

I think most of the players involved know what has to be done but the political pressures, catering to special interest groups, is moving us down the wrong path. - MBC

http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/09/09/short-u.s.-stocks./

"...What most experts see as a strengthening U.S. rebound, I see as an increasingly dangerous “false dawn” – for these two key reasons:
  • An overly expansive monetary policy that’s almost certain to spawn inflation.
  • And a record-level budget deficit that will cause interest rates to spike, crimping economic growth.
...U.S. policies that were intended to combat the financial crisis that broke last year – as well as the recession that’s been plaguing us since December 2007 – have actually inflicted a lot of weakness upon our economic system.

...federal government has made $11.6 trillion in financing commitments, many of which will saddle us with debt for generations – some of it forever. Outlays of that magnitude in a $14 trillion economy are bound to have lasting implications: Think of the consumer who has a series of maxxed-out credit cards – he’ll make the minimum payments, but the actual balance will never get paid down.

And the foundation for this financial fiasco was actually constructed several years ago.

After the bursting of the 1996-2000 “dot-com” bubble, the U.S. Federal Reserve re-inflated the money supply. That caused stocks to resume their upward march, and as we now know, also inflated a housing bubble of such enormous size that it caused a general financial-system crash when that real estate bubble burst in 2007-08.

This time around, the Fed has been even more expansive. The benchmark Federal Funds Rate was 1.0% in 2002-04. This time it is 0.25%. What’s more, this time around we’ve had a $2 trillion expansion of the Fed balance sheet, a doubling of the monetary base and $300 billion worth of direct central bank purchases of government debt. Given this orgy of Fed expansionism, it’s likely that the onset of inflation – whether it’s in consumer prices or asset prices – will be correspondingly worse. In fact, we’re already seeing that gold prices are once again making a run at their all-time high. And crude oil hovers at about $70 per barrel, a level that would have been unimaginable before 2004.

...U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke says he will tighten monetary policy in good time. But why should we believe him? If he tries to tighten significantly, he will incur the wrath of the Obama administration and the Democrats in Congress.

Even back during the 2001-04 time frame – when there was an administration in place that claimed to believe in monetary stringency – the Fed didn’t tighten. Bernanke himself was among the most aggressive opponents of tightening. Back in 2002, in fact, when inflation was running at a perfectly respectable 2%, Bernanke actually spun myths about the imminent onset of “deflation.”

Given what we know, it seems that if the current economic bounce shows even the slightest signs of faltering, Bernanke won’t tighten – he’ll pump even more money into the U.S. financial system. Rest assured that the administration, Congress, and much of the media will be cheering his move.

Borrow Now, Hurt Later

If an overly expansive monetary policy was the only problem we faced, it might not be so bad. Unfortunately, there’s more.

Lots more.

Unlike in 2002 – in fact, unlike any other time in U.S. history – this country now has a budget deficit in excess of 10% of gross domestic product (GDP). For fiscal 2009, that was forgivable: We’ve had a major recession, and a shattering financial crisis, which the federal government has tried to battle with aggressive bailout programs.

Here’s the problem, however: The projected deficit remains above 10% of GDP for fiscal 2010, even though no additional bailouts are contemplated and the Obama administration is projecting a modest-but-steady economic recovery.

The result is harder to predict – this country hasn’t travelled down this particular path before. This strategy bears some resemblance to the position Japan found itself in during its so-called “Lost Decade” of the 1990s. But even Japan’s deficit never reached this 10% threshold.

In Japan, the effect seems to have been the gradual abandonment of small business finance, and the resulting starvation of the most critical factor in economic growth – entrepreneurship.

The small-business sector creates most of the new jobs in the U.S. economy. But in a challenging environment, it’s easy to see why this sector gets overlooked. Without political connections or large contracts to hand out, the small-business sector ends up being last in line in the financing queue when the economy faces strong headwinds. Why should banks or other people lend to small businesses when the U.S. government bond market stands as such as huge, safe parking place for their cash?

Interest rates will also become an issue. With the inflationary pressures we expect to see from the overly expansive monetary policy we’ve described, long-term interest rates are likely going to rise anyway. As was the case in Japan’s decade-long malaise, these forces will combine to spark high default rates in the banking system, low or zero economic growth, and a general downward trend in the stock market.

All of this will make it tough for small businesses to obtain the cash they need to grow, meaning this key job-creation engine will have to sputter along.

It’s still early in the game, and there are many factors to consider, so the future economic picture remains a bit murky right now. But my guess is that the bubble in asset prices will be largely confined to commodities, that economic growth after this current initial burst will relapse, and that U.S. stocks will prove to be the same generally unattractive investment that they were in 1970s – the era of the so-called “Nifty Fifty.” If the stock market bubble gets even more exuberant from here, the relapse will be correspondingly more painful.

Profitable Pockets

Despite this dour backdrop, three things are worth remembering:

  • First, all U.S. stocks are not created equal. Although I’m saying it’s time to short U.S. stocks, and I see tough times ahead for the key indices, there will always be individual stocks worth consideration, such as the “Alpha Bulldog” stocks I highlight in the Permanent Wealth Investor service.
  • Second, the best way to play this looming downdraft – either as a direct profit opportunity or as a way of hedging your current portfolio – is through the use of what I like to call “Stage 3″ investments. An example of one such investment is long-dated “put” options on the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, which trade on the Chicago Board Options Exchange. If you buy these options when they are way “out of the money” with a strike price far below the current price, in a real bear market (like that of 2007-09), you will see them really zoom up in value as the S&P drops down closer to the strike price, or possibly even falls below it.
  • And third, understand that my pessimism about the U.S. market doesn’t apply to every other market around the world. While the monetary problems are more or less global, the budget-deficit problems are not. For instance, you might want to consider investments in Japan, where a recent election should spawn the kind of economic changes that will benefit savvy investors. Germany, too, looks to have avoided the contagion of “stimulitus,” which is why its economy is now viewed as one of the healthiest in Europe. Consider the iShares exchange-traded fund (ETF) entry for each of those two markets: The iShares MSCI Japan Index Fund (NYSE: EWJ) and the iShares MSCI Germany Index Fund (NYSE: EWG). They each warrant a look.

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

Despite What the Bears are Saying, We’re in the Market Sweet Spot

http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/09/08/bull-market-stocks/

"...most important ingredients for rising stocks prices are not corporate earnings and global economic growth. Instead, the key elements are interest rates, inflation and sentiment along with help from government fiscal and tax policy.

Right now... Inflation is low, interest rates are very low, governments around the world are pouring money into the economy and sentiment is still well below bull market peaks. Historically, analysts at independent BCA Research say, this is the environment in which stocks prices have done their best.

As long as a recovery remains anemic with lackluster job growth, it remains the subject of tender mercy by policymakers desperate to placate an unhappy electorate. And so it is weakness that keeps the government from withdrawing assistance by applying higher interest rates, raising taxes and halting loan support programs.

...remember that rocket launch out of March was fueled in part by the U.S. Federal Reserve’s announcement it would directly purchase $300 billion worth of U.S. Treasury debt through its Permanent Open Market Operations. Is it any coincidence that stocks are beginning to weaken as that initial allocation begins to run dry? According to my calculations, more than $276 billion has already been spent. At current spending rates, the remaining funds will only last another two weeks or so...

...If recovery is indeed drawn-out, this is paradoxically great news. It seems backwards, but a long, slow, U-shaped recovery is exactly what investors should want to see. The robust, V-shaped economic recovery that politicians seem to want would be the worst possible thing to occur....

...if you’ll allow me – the cynical capitalist – to express a point of view, it’s this: The more companies cut jobs, the more their expenses drop and the more their earnings (corporate profits) rise. The reason that unemployment persists long after recessions end is that companies become addicted to headcount reductions once they realize that the market always rewards cost-cutting. While policymakers and citizens complain that a reduction in workers will lead to a reduction in sales, the market persists in preferring the productivity gains of slimmed-down, more motivated labor forces..."

Troubling thoughts about unemployment

Troubling - Think about the following for a minute. Manufacturing employment is at its lowest level since April 1941. Jobs in education and health care remain less affected. Our administration is proposing funding expanded education and health care spending yet manufacturing employment is at it's lowest level. Where is the money to come from to fund these expansions? If people aren't working to make something then there is simply no chance to generate the tax revenues to fund expansions. Jobs in education and health care will eventually have to suffer too! Can't anyone see this or am I missing something?

In my opinion it was wrong to have spent the stimulus money as we did and it's even more wrong to continue on this path of expanded spending without having figured out a clear and supportable path out of this mess. Everyone is rushing around screaming "crisis" and "urgent action is required" yet no one has proven they're capable of taking an extra moment to really think through any of these actions and the long and short term impacts. How many time are we going to flunk history!?

Consider how long it's going to take to integrate the unemployed back into the workforce. Consider how many are going to become addicted to unemployment compensation and then welfare. Living with their girlfriend and using her welfare, which they'll expand by having more children. No evidence this would be the case (sarcasm)!

"...A full 65% of all companies are still in the process of slashing their headcounts. The adult male unemployment rate has expanded to 10% as male-centric jobs in construction and manufacturing are slashed while sectors traditionally dominated by women, including education and health care, remain less affected. Manufacturing employment, which is showing some signs of stabilization, cut 63,000 jobs and now has its lowest level of employment since April 1941.

And there is also the problem of the rising ranks of long-term unemployed as more job losses are permanent rather than temporary layoffs. A full 54% of the unemployed are not temporarily laid off, while 33% have been looking for a job for six months or more.

The longer people are out of work, the more skills are lost and the harder it is to reintegrate into the work force. Not only is this socially damaging; but it reduces the potential growth rate of the economy. This is the effective speed limit at which the economy can grow without causing inflation."...


http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/09/08/bull-market-stocks/

Daily Pfenning - 9/8/09

http://www.dailypfennig.com/

"...euro has stretched that move to the 1.4480 level! WOW! Looks to me as though the deficits that the dollar drags around are not looking to sharp to investors...

Chinese stocks were up 2% overnight, so that has led to even more risk taking this morning in Europe...

You know when the dollar is not faring well, when not only the usual suspects of euro, Aussie, kiwi, loonies and francs are taking liberties with the dollar, but also the Japanese yen... And THAT folks, is an indication to me that maybe, just maybe, cause you never know, fundamentals could be coming back to the head of the class. Oh! And one other thing, that puts a nail in the dollar's coffin is, last night I checked the price of Gold too... Then it was $999. This morning... It's $1,005!!!!!!

So... We've got euros kicking tail and taking names later, and Gold kicking the dollar when it's down. We've seen this type of rout on the dollar before... They used to take place at least once a week before the financial meltdown in August of 2008... And before the collapse of Lehman Bros. That's when the markets, traders, and investors, all had their eye on the fundamentals ball, and whacking the dollar out of the park whenever another piece of bad data came the dollar's way.

If this is the beginning of another period like we saw pre-August 2008, then get strap yourself in, and make certain to keep your arms and legs inside at all times during the ride! If it's a false dawn, it sure is a strong false dawn!

One of the best writers for a newspaper, that I've come across is Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, and I came across an article he did this weekend... This news could also be one of the reasons the dollar is getting sold across the board this morning. Here's a snippet of the story...

"Cheng Siwei, former vice-chairman of the Standing Committee and now head of China's green energy drive, said Beijing was dismayed by the Fed's recourse to "credit easing"... He went on to say, "If they keep printing money to buy bonds it will lead to inflation, and after a year or two the dollar will fall hard. Most of our foreign reserves are in US bonds and this is very difficult to change, so we will diversify incremental reserves into euros, yen, and other currencies."

So... According to a top member of the Communist hierarchy... The U.S. Federal Reserve's policy of printing money to buy Treasury debt threatens to set off a serious decline of the dollar and compel China to redesign its foreign reserve policy... Shouldn't that be enough to compel other owners of dollars to do the same? I would certainly think so, folks... I would certainly think so!

And in a not so wide spread story... The United Nations (UN) is talking about creating a new global reserve bank to issue a new currency to protect emerging markets from the "confidence game of financial speculation... HEY! The UN said this... Not me! So... Those of us who have read the book, The Creature from Jekyll Island, have the conspiracy chills going down our collective spines right now...

Isn't this the second time this year that we've heard about a "global reserve bank"? The first time we heard about it, the IMF was to assume that role and issue special drawing rights (SDR's) as a global currency... Now, we hear something a big different, but it's the same folks... I'll tell you right now what they are doing... The "powers to be" are "getting us used to hearing about this" by releasing stories here and there... That way, when the time comes for them to unveil their plan to have a global currency, they'll be able to say..."We've been talking about this for a long time, and no on had a problem with it then!"

OK... Enough of the conspiracy stuff...

Speaking of jobs... The U.S. Jobs Jamboree on Friday held a couple of surprises... 1. the number of jobs lost in August was smaller than expected at -216,000... And 2. the unemployment rate rose to 9.7%... Oh! And the previous month's number was revised up from -247,000 to -276,000... Sneaky how that do that, eh? The media is all over the better than expected -216,000, and forgot to mention the upward revision to the previous month's number, which wasn't small potatoes either!

For many years, I've tried to get people to look at the revisions, the Weekly Hours worked, and the Avg Hourly Earnings to get the "real" beef from the Jobs Jamboree report... We just talked about the revision... The Weekly Hours Worked and Hourly Earnings were a non-event, with nothing to tell us that the economy is growing stronger, or that it's getting weaker... So, to me... The Jobs Jamboree was a washout except for the revision!...

Speaking of the renminbi... The Chinese allowed the currency to gain VS the dollar by a wide margin overnight. This is the first significant move VS the dollar in some time...

And with all these strong currency moves... The dollar index has fallen to a low for the year at 77.24... This is a significant move, folks... Because... In the 1st QTR of this year, the dollar index got down to 77.40, and bounced higher from there... And here we are again... It was thought that the 77.40 figure would prove to be a resistance figure... But the dollar slid right past that figure... I would think that having the index remain below 77.40 for the day and overnight would be HUGE!

... Let's recap... The dollar has fallen big overnight... The Chinese are not happy with the Fed printing dollars... The UN is talking about replacing the dollar with a global currency that is issued by a "new global reserve bank"... And all the currencies along with Gold and Silver are rallying on these things...
"

Friday, September 4, 2009

Financial stability depends on more capital By Timothy Geithner

Just read the whole thing. More govt. control on international level. I know I don't understand all this stuff deeply but where's the capital going to come from? Print more money? - MBC

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/638b9eb2-98ba-11de-aa1b-00144feabdc0.html

Obama May Need Sense of Crisis to Revive Health-Care Overhaul

Be interesting to see if this is an accurate forecast of how the Administration plays this one. - MBC

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a5HawfX.Mxt8

"...Obama returns to Washington next week in search of one thing that can revive his health-care overhaul: a sense of crisis.

...Obama must recapture the sense of urgency that led to passage of the economic rescue package in February, analysts said.

...said Stephen Wayne, a professor of government at Georgetown University in Washington. “You do need a crisis to generate movement in Congress and to help build a consensus.”

...Emanuel said the administration made unprecedented health-care progress in eight months.

‘Not There Yet’

“We gave Congress a charge, we gave them broad outlines, which is the reason we are farther along than any of the five presidents that have tried,” Emanuel said in an interview yesterday. “We’re not there yet, and this speech is intended to finish the job.”

...“There is a problem in our health-care system today, and we need reform; it’s not a crisis,” said Ed Gillespie, White House counselor to President George W. Bush. “It’s just people saying this is way too much, way too fast, we don’t know where this money is going and we don’t know where it’s coming from.”

The CBS survey of 1,097 Americans Aug. 27-31 found Obama’s approval fell 12 percentage points from a high of 68 percent in April to 56 percent; the error margin is 3 percentage points.

A survey of 4,518 likely voters by Zogby International Aug. 28-31 put Obama’s approval rating at a record-low 42 percent;..."

Thursday, September 3, 2009

Wells Fargo to Repay TARP Without Raising New Equity (Update2)

I should control my cynicism but it just gives me such a thrill to see another bailed out financial institution doing so well. It's nice to see Mr. Buffett speak so highly of how things are being handled by this Administration, he doesn't have any vested interest - right?! - MBC

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aorL3gHBnGsI

"...Wells Fargo & Co. plans to repay the U.S. bank bailout program “shortly” without raising equity, a tactic that would protect the value of stakes held by investors including Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc.

“We will pay it back, but we’re going to pay it back in a shareholder-friendly way,” John Stumpf, president and chief executive officer of the San Francisco-based lender, said today in an interview on Bloomberg Television, referring to the TARP funds. “We are now earning capital so quickly, organically, we don’t want to dilute our existing shareholders.”

The U.S. Housing Market’s False Dawn

http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/09/01/u.s.-housing-market/

"...New home sales jumped almost 10% in July, while the Case-Shiller home price index rose for the second successive month. Yet luxury homebuilder Toll Brothers lost $493 million in the quarter ending July 31, considerably worse than analysts had expected.

Housing stocks are certainly acting as if a recovery must be on the way... Yet all of these companies are still racking up quarterly losses, according to their most recently released earnings reports...

In terms of house prices, it would seem unlikely that a bear market bottom has been reached. Yes, the average house price is now back down around its long-term average of about 3.2 times average earnings, or only a little above it. But history suggests that markets don’t bottom at their average valuation: In fact, after such a huge excess to the upside, they overshoot on the downside.

The Case-Shiller 20-cities index is still 42% above its January 2000 level, having outpaced inflation during the last 9½ years. Yet January 2000 was not the bottom of a housing depression – far from it, in fact. That was actually close to the top of the dot-com bubble, when valuations of all assets were at all-time highs. So an average price over the whole country that – even now – remains 42% above the average price recorded at the very top of a huge economic boom does not seem like a market bottom to me.

You also have to remember that the U.S. federal government is hugely subsidizing the market. Interest rates are artificially low, and the U.S. Federal Reserve has bought more than $1 trillion worth of housing debt. Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM) and Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE) have been rescued by the government, and provided with more than $100 billion of taxpayer capital. And Ginnie Mae (the Government National Mortgage Association), directly a government agency, has provided almost $1 trillion of mortgages that require a 3% down payment.

And that’s not all.

The government is spending additional billions helping homeowners avoid foreclosure. First-time buyers are given a tax credit of $8,000 towards the down payment on their house – this credit currently runs out on December 1. So the current overall market bottom is propped up artificially. Even if the proposed tax-credit extension is approved, at some point, those props will be removed...

From a nationwide standpoint, the most likely path for the housing market is for a modest recovery, with some later slippage as subsidies are removed. Housing is likely destined to once again become a highly regional market, as it always was prior to the 2001-2006 market boom, with the cycles in each market being very different..."

Daily Pfennig 9-3-2009

http://www.dailypfennig.com/

"...briefly talk about the SEC, who made an announcement yesterday that they had done an investigation of the Madoff audits, and did not find any fraud... Just mistakes... Really? Mistakes? That's what they call them? Even Bernie Madoff himself says that he was "astonished" that the SEC failed to shut him down after interviewing him in 2006!..."

"...
The Fed is tossing around the idea of removing pieces of the stimulus... Treasury Sec. Geithner, a.k.a. the cheater... doesn't agree and has stated that he believes it to be "too early" to exit stimulus strategies... Geithner is getting ready for the G-20 meeting of finance ministers and Central Bankers beginning tomorrow in London, and had this to say... "We've come a very long way but I think we have to be realistic, we've got a long way to go still."

Well... That's the most intelligent thing I've heard him say so far!

Hey did you see that bond king, Bill Gross of PIMCO, chimed in on this... "To the extent that we have had a trillion dollars worth of stimulus, from the standpoint of deficits, and more, the government basically has to continue to do that and to add to that in order to keep the economy chugging along," he said. "To the extent that that's limited, to the extent that they pull back on some of those stimulus programs -- 'Cash for Clunkers' and those types of things -- then the double dip moves into the realm of possibility."

Yes... Double dipping... It's my call for this economy..."

"...
yesterday's data cupboard printed a stronger than expected Productivity number here in the U.S. So, doesn't that make you feel better, that you probably had to work longer hours at the same wage, because 1 in 5 American workers are out of jobs, and you have to take up the slack? That's the root of Productivity folks... Sure there are other things like technology, etc. but at the root... It's all about you...

That's why I don't like this report..."

"...
Last week, I told you that the U.S. had to deal with another large amount of Treasuries to auction off... Last week it was $197 Billion... And no word of problems dealing with these... But, have you noticed that the 10-year yield, which just a few weeks ago was 3.80%, has fallen to 3.34%? Hmmm... I wonder how that happened? It means that the price of the 10-year has been rising, which would only happen if there was a truckload of buying... Hmmm... I had better go to the Big Finish here before I blow out a gasket!..."

Students Borrow More Than Ever for College

Imagine the future with these kids coming out of school, strapped with this kind of debt. They'll be unable to afford homes, marriage, etc... and many will likely default. The economic implications are pretty clear but the moral and social implications are myriad. Increased stress levels will reflect in increased health issues and likely in crime too. Don't bet on any tuition decreases until it's too late to have any impact. - MBC

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204731804574388682129316614.html

"...New numbers from the U.S. Education Department show that federal student-loan disbursements—the total amount borrowed by students and received by schools—in the 2008-09 academic year grew about 25% over the previous year, to $75.1 billion... two-thirds of college students borrow to pay for college, and their average debt load is $23,186 by the time they graduate..."

Monday, August 31, 2009

As Big Banks Repay Bailout Money, U.S. Sees a Profit

This is the load of BS spin NYT puts out. Does it really take a lot of thought to figure out the travesty of having lent to these guys in the first place? They make huge profits, payback their loans with interest, and move on and NYT tries to makes it sound great. Of course the banks want to pay back quickly and make sure the gov't. stays out of the banking business. It would ruin the party they have going on. - MBC

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/31/business/economy/31taxpayer.html?_r=1&th&emc=th

"...taxpayers have begun seeing profits from the hundreds of billions of dollars in aid that many critics thought might never be seen again.

The profits, collected from eight of the biggest banks that have fully repaid their obligations to the government, come to about $4 billion, or the equivalent of about 15 percent annually, according to calculations compiled for The New York Times..."

"...“The taxpayers want their money back and they want the government out of our banking system,” Representative Jeb Hensarling, a Texas Republican and a member of the Congressional Oversight Panel..."

Saturday, August 29, 2009

Desperate for Capital, the FDIC Backs Away From Tougher Rules Governing Private Equity Purchases of Failed U.S. Banks

Another reason to fear all the talk about things 'turning around'. Too many bad things still roiling around in the financial industry. - MBC

http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/08/28/fdic-funding-crisis/

"...A new Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) plan to offload busted banks to vulture investors strikes an uneven balance between private equity players and public taxpayers and may inadvertently sow the seeds for another round of bank failures.

The FDIC currently insures bank depositors up to $250,000 – up from $100,000 prior to the financial crisis. So far this year, 81 banks have failed, costing the FDIC an estimated $21.5 billion.

And the situation is almost certainly going to get worse..."

"...number of distressed banks rose to the highest level in 15 years during the second quarter, thanks to an economic malaise that’s saddling banks with a growing level of bad loans..."

"...In a fatalistic twist of irony, however, the FDIC’s demand for another special assessment in the fourth quarter and another expected special assessment in the first quarter of 2010 may tip several more banks into failure.

Although there seems to be a desperate need for private equity capital to come running to the rescue, the reality unfortunately isn’t that simple..."

"...The ongoing cost of a busted bank becomes higher for the FDIC if the agency cannot merge that failed institution with a healthy player, or can’t sell it outright. When The FDIC can’t find a willing partner or buyer, the agency must instead manage the “unwinding” of every failed bank’s stockpile of illiquid and toxic assets. With so many more banks in trouble and so many fewer banks willing to acquire additional suspect assets, private equity firms have offered to step up and buy failed banks these professional investors believe can be turned around....

...The FDIC issued its final decision on the matter on Wednesday. The new version was much weaker, once again underscoring the federal government’s proclivity for weakening banking regulations – a willingness we’ve repeatedly warned will have dire consequences for the U.S. financial system, as well as for the broader economy.

These alterations are setting the stage for an escalation in bank failures. The real losers will once again be the U.S. taxpayers, who will end up footing the bill for the FDIC’s failure to take a tough stand.

How much weaker were the new regulations, when compared with the earlier proposals? In one instance, instead of the initially proposed requirement that new investors maintain a 15% Tier 1 common equity capital ratio – three times what traditional bank holding companies are required to maintain – the new entry hurdle is only a 10% ratio.

Private equity firms will be spared the requirement of other bank holding companies and will not be called upon as a “source of strength,” should their investment in a bank need shoring up...

...The FDIC granted other compromises granted in favor of private equity buyers. For instance, the agency spared them from having to cross-guarantee their portfolio-bank investments – unless they owned at least 80% of two or more banks..."

"...valiant efforts Bair, the FDIC chairman, to keep the howling wolves of private equity at the door and out of the banking henhouse were ultimately undermined by the rapidly dwindling coffers of the Deposit Insurance Fund, which brought the FDIC to its knees. The compromises in the final policy statement grant the private-equity crowd a lot of what it was lobbying for while only momentarily sparing the FDIC the embarrassment of being knocked out.

But make no mistake. That day of reckoning is on its way. And not even the entrepreneurially gifted private-equity set will be able to keep that from happening..."

"...The problem with banks is that they became too leveraged. When they couldn’t amass assets on their books, against which they had to set aside “reserves,” they established “off-balance-sheet” vehicles to acquire leveraged pools of assets. They were leveraged inside and out.

But now the originators of the leveraged-buyout business model want to control taxpayer-backed banks, to apply another round of leverage to already crippled banks in order to squeeze out all the profits possible. Although this comes at a cost to duped and already drained taxpayers, regulators, legislators and the American public would be foolish to expect anything else from the private equity crowd. If the FDIC thinks it has a problem now, wait until the next implosion of leveraged banks happens..."

"...the Private Equity Council, an industry advocacy group, without recognizing the irony of its comment, suggested that mandating higher capital ratios for private equity buyers of failed banks would actually increase the risk at those banks because their owners would essentially have to employ more leverage to generate sufficient returns to meet the higher capital standards – while still generating returns high enough to satisfy the investors in their private-equity funds.

If that’s not an advance look at the next round of financial-sector problems we could be facing, we are deluding ourselves..."

"...Unfortunately, we’ve once again placed ourselves in a position where the viable solutions to the problems that were created will end up causing an entirely new set of problems – problems that always seem to provide a benefit to the old crony network while leaving the battered U.S. taxpayer as the ultimate victim.

We have no one to blame but ourselves..."

Friday, August 28, 2009

Paul Krugman: Till Debt Does Its Part

My comments in red - MBC

Paul Krugman: Till Debt Does Its Part

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/28/opinion/28krugman.html?_r=1

Should you be worried about the national debt, or the politicians in charge of it?:

Till Debt Does Its Part, by Paul Krugman, Commentary, NY Times: So new budget projections show a cumulative deficit of $9 trillion over the next decade. According to many commentators, that’s a terrifying number, requiring drastic action — in particular, of course, canceling efforts to boost the economy and calling off health care reform.


The truth is more complicated and less frightening. Right now deficits are actually helping the economy. In fact, deficits here and in other major economies saved the world from a much deeper slump. The longer-term outlook is worrying, but it’s not catastrophic.


The only real reason for concern is political. The United States can deal with its debts if politicians of both parties are, in the end, willing to show at least a bit of maturity. (I hate the use of this term, 'maturity'. If someone doesn’t agree with Mr. Krugman they are considered less mature? Anyway, even not taking offense at his words just consider what he’s saying – ‘we can deal with our debts if politicians… show maturity.’ That’s an awfully big IF and another thing history has proven quite unlikely to happen. Politicians are solely worried about amassing power, influence and funds to assure their next election.) Need I say more?


Let’s start with the effects of this year’s deficit. ... Consider what would have happened if the U.S. government and its counterparts around the world had tried to balance their budgets as they did in the early 1930s. (Where is this coming from? Who is talking about ‘balanced budget’? We’re talking about reducing or trying to get some control over the deficit. What a leap to absurdity.) It’s a scary thought. If governments had raised taxes or slashed spending in the face of the slump, if they had refused to rescue distressed financial institutions, we could all too easily have seen a full replay of the Great Depression. (Check history – many feel now, with review, Federal actions prolonged things rather than shortened things.)


As I said, deficits saved the world. (So he claims.)


In fact,... the ... White House forecast shows a nation stuck in purgatory for a prolonged period, with high unemployment persisting for years. If that’s at all correct — and I fear that it will be — we should be doing more, not less, to support the economy.


But what about all that debt we’re incurring? That’s a bad thing, but it’s important to have some perspective. ...

Here’s one way to look at it: We’re looking at a rise in the debt/G.D.P. ratio of about 40 percentage points. The real interest on that additional debt (you want to subtract off inflation) (Why?) will probably be around 1 percent of G.D.P., or 5 percent of federal revenue. (I question the value of this analysis – he's understating by only considering interest on additional debt - our entire debt is still there and must be dealt with and that does sound a bit overwhelming.) That doesn’t sound like an overwhelming burden.


Now, this assumes that the U.S. government’s credit will remain good so that it’s able to borrow at relatively low interest rates. So far, that’s still true. (We’re buying or own debt – quantitative easing) Despite the prospect of big deficits, the government is able to borrow money long-term at ... less than 3.5 percent, which is low by historical standards. People making bets with real money don’t seem to be worried about U.S. solvency. ...

So is there anything to worry about? Yes, but the dangers are political, not economic. (Very stupid argument – lacks the very basic insight of how the politics of any situation plays out in the economic reality)


As I’ve said, those 10-year projections aren’t as bad as you may have heard. Over the really long term, however, the U.S. government will have big problems unless it makes some major changes. In particular, it has to rein in the growth of Medicare and Medicaid spending.


That shouldn’t be hard in the context of overall health care reform. After all, America spends far more on health care than other advanced countries, without better results, so we should be able to make our system more cost-efficient.


But that won’t happen, of course, if even the most modest attempts to improve the system are successfully demagogued — by conservatives! (pure genius – Mr. Maturity blaming the conservatives, as it this single issue is what’s solely behind keeping healthcare reform bill from approval!) — as efforts to “pull the plug on grandma.”


So don’t fret about this year’s deficit; we actually need to run up federal debt right now and need to keep doing it until the economy is on a solid path to recovery. And the extra debt should be manageable. If we face a potential problem, it’s not because the economy can’t handle the extra debt. Instead, it’s the politics, stupid.

The New Crisis Report: What's in It for CFOs?

Just one of my questions from ignorance but could this 'flexibility to choose when to apply fair-value standards to financial instruments' be an issue that's still going to come to a head at some point? - MBC


http://www.cfo.com/article.cfm/14155093/1/c_2984368

"...A global advisory group released 37 pages of recommendations on Monday discussing how regulators, accounting standard–setters, and — to some extent — CFOs can help prevent the next financial crisis, and work to fix existing "weaknesses" in accounting standards..."

"...Independence was a hot-button issue during the past year, as standard-setters on both sides of the Atlantic were bullied by special interests and politicians to relax fair-value accounting rules... "Accounting rules of the highest quality — written by independent standard-setters — will help to restore investor faith in the fairness and integrity of financial markets," (said) Goldschmid, a former SEC commissioner..."

"...The reach of undue influence played out on the world stage last November, when German chancellor Angela Merkel, French president Nicolas Sarkozy, and other global policymakers jumped into the fray on fair-value accounting. As a result, the IASB ignored its normal rule-revision process and rushed out guidance that gave banks and other companies more flexibility to choose when to apply fair-value standards to financial instruments.

The expedited process came after banks lobbied heavily for the change — claiming that fair-value accounting led to excessive write-downs — and European policymakers threatened to pass laws that essentially would have given the banks the accounting treatment they sought. By March, members of Congress were vilifying fair-value accounting as the cause of the financial crisis, and FASB quickly pushed through its new guidance on valuing assets..."

"..."What would be wrong, however, would be to suspend due process and take direction from Congress or business interests who say, 'use this accounting method because that's what we want,'" asserted the former SEC official..."

"...the FCAG asked the standard-setters to "reconsider" the appropriateness of including credit risk when measuring the fair value of a liability. At issue is an accounting rule oddity that allows companies to book a gain when their credit rating sinks. Further, the group is prodding the accounting boards to continue consulting with bank regulators concerning consolidation and derecognition issues, especially as they pertain to off-balance-sheet transactions. From the FCAG's perspective, the way financial instruments are treated under accounting rules may also affect regulatory capital, and therefore robust risk disclosures should be made to investors..."

Wednesday, August 26, 2009

Subprime Lenders Getting U.S. Subsidies, Report Says

More debt - great - Wonder why the mortgage lenders and servicers are reluctant to participate? Shouldn't have to think about this one too long. - MBC

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/25/AR2009082502975.html

"...Many of the lenders eligible to receive billions of dollars from the government's massive foreclosure prevention program helped fuel the housing crisis by issuing risky subprime loans, according to a report to be issued Wednesday by the Center for Public Integrity..."

"..."Mortgage lenders and servicers have been reluctant to participate in foreclosure prevention programs despite their role in creating the subprime debacle. Intense pressure from Congress and the White House hasn't worked, either," the report said. "The stick has not been effective, so the Obama administration is offering a carrot -- billions of dollars in incentive payments to lenders and loan servicers to encourage them to participate."

"...report has drawn fire from lenders. It oversimplifies the causes of the housing crisis and misses the complexity of the markets, said Scott Talbott, chief lobbyist for the Financial Services Roundtable, which represents some of the nation's largest lenders..."

A Sobering Wake Up Call

The Federal Government will spend almost $31,000 per household! What part of that are any of you getting? I know it costs to fund an army, etc... but come on - I think avg. household income is $50 - $55,000. Can we keep this up? - MBC

http://blog.heritage.org/2009/08/26/morning-bell-a-sobering-wake-up-call/

"...Washington Post reports:

The extra $1.9 trillion in red ink mainly reflects the Office of Management and Budget’s adoption of more realistic — that is, more pessimistic — estimates of economic growth and unemployment. White House officials protest that their original, rosier numbers made sense at the time; actually, plenty of forecasters, including those at the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, made more accurate calls. This situation was foreseeable and should have been acknowledged earlier.

"...good that the Obama administration is finally admitting that the fundamental assumptions driving their economic policy were wrong, the reality of our current budget deficit, and what President Obama’s policies threaten to do to our national debt over the next decade, are truly sobering. Heritage senior policy analyst Brian Riedl details the carnage:
  • Since World War II, the largest budget deficit recorded was 6.0 percent of GDP in 1983. The Bush Administration oversaw budget deficits averaging 2.0 percent of GDP. The projected 2009 budget deficit of 11.2 percent of GDP would nearly double the post-war record.
  • The 2009 budget deficit will be larger than all budget deficits from 2002 through 2007 combined. More than 43 cents of every dollar Washington spends in 2009 will have been borrowed.
  • While President Obama claims to have inherited the 2009 budget deficit, it is important to note that the estimated 2009 budget deficit has increased by $400 billion since his inauguration, and the whole point of the “stimulus” was to increase deficit spending to nearly $2 trillion based on the unproven notion that would it alleviate the recession.
  • The 22 percent spending increase projected for 2009 represents the largest government expansion since the 1952 height of the Korean War (adjusted for inflation). Federal spending is up 57 percent since 2001.
  • In 2009, Washington will spend $30,958 per household–the highest level in American history–and under President Obama’s budget, the figure will rise above $33,000 by 2019.
  • The White House brags that it will cut the deficit in half by 2013. The President does not mention that the deficit has nearly quadrupled this year. Merely cutting it in half from that bloated level would still leave budget deficits twice as high as under President Bush.
  • The public national debt–$5.8 trillion as of 2008–is projected to double by 2012 and nearly triple by 2019. Thus, America would accumulate more government debt under President Obama than under every President in American history from George Washington to George W. Bush combined.

And now for the real kicker: none of these numbers include the costs of Obamacare which would create another $1.5 trillion health care entitlement on top of our existing unsustainable entitlement obligations. The OMB’s Mid-Session Review should serve as a wake up call to the American people. President Obama’s policies are leading us down a path of unsustainable spending and borrowing.





Daily Pfenning 8-26-09

http://www.dailypfennig.com/

"...radio interview on Bloomberg yesterday with a panel of investment strategists, and some were of the opinion that, and tell me if this at all sounds familiar, the dollar will continue to weaken this year as the global economy recovers from recession and investors seek currencies linked to growth...

The idea was simply that too many investors had cash tied up in T-Bills, and T-Notes, and that as the global economies recover ahead of the U.S. there will be higher yields to be gotten in those global economies. So, when the investors sell their T-Bill and T-Notes to buy overseas, the dollar will get sold, and thus lead it to weaken more and more...

Speaking of Treasuries... once again the U.S. Treasury is going to the well... And they will auction $197 Billion in new Treasuries this week... Is it just me, or does any one else wonder just how much more debt foreigners can choke down? I guess the thing to do this week and next is to check the cartel's, I mean the Fed Reserve's balance sheet to see if they take back any of these auctioned Treasuries like they did last month with the 7-year T-Note auction. Monetizing the debt, printing more paper dollars like it's Monopoly money...

And in a follow up from yesterday's report on the Budget Deficit being forecast for the next 10 years... The total of the deficit for those 10 years is now forecast to be $9 Trillion dollars... And in a follow up from yesterday's rant about forecasts... The $9 Trillion is more than $2 Trillion more than was forecast just 6 months ago! Hmmm... Another $9 Trillion!

Hey! A month ago, when I prepared for the Agora Financial Reserve Wealth Symposium in Vancouver, the National Debt stood at a level that put each citizen's piece of the debt at $37,000... Today, just one month after I pulled that data, each citizen's piece of the debt now stands at $38,191! That's absolutely shameful, folks..."

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

White House, Congress projects record deficits

Comment that continues to be paraded "..."This recession was simply worse than the information that we and other forecasters had back in last fall and early this winter," said Obama economic adviser Christina Romer..." The information was there but the ones who missed it float this out as some plausible excuse and still expect us to have confidence in them being the folks to lead us out of this mess. Scary part is many folks are buying it! - MBC

http://www.comcast.net/articles/news-general/20090825/US.Obama.Economy/

"...White House Office of Management and Budget and the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office predicted the budget deficit this year would swell to nearly $1.6 trillion, a record, and far above the then-record 2008 budget deficit of $455 billion.

But while figures released by the White House foresee a cumulative $9 trillion deficit from 2010-2019, $2 trillion more than the administration estimated in May, congressional budget analysts put the 10-year figure at a lower $7.14 trillion.

One reason for the difference: The CBO projection is based on an assumption that all the tax cuts put into place in the administration of former President George W. Bush will expire on schedule by 2011 as dictated by current law. President Barack Obama's budget baseline, however, hews to his proposal to keep the tax cuts in place for families earning less than $250,000 a year.

Beyond the 10-year forecast, the nation will face further challenges posed by rising health care costs and the aging of the population, the CBO said. "The budget remains on an unsustainable path" over the long-term and will require some combination of lower spending and higher tax revenues, it said.

Both forecasts see unemployment rising to 10 percent before falling and both suggest growth will return to the economy later this year but that recovery will be slow after the longest and deepest recession since the 1930s..."

"...continuing stresses on the economy have, in effect, increased the size of the stimulus package because the government will have to spend more in unemployment insurance and food stamps, Orszag said. He said the cost of the stimulus package — which spends most of its money in fiscal year 2010 — will grow by tens of billions of dollars above the original $787 billion..."

Daily Pfennig 8/25/2009

http://www.dailypfennig.com/

"...see where a Manhattan Chief U.S. District Judge ruled against the Fed Reserve? Way to go Loretta Preska, the judge, who has rejected the argument that the Federal Reserve was making about disclosing loan records... The Fed said that loan records aren't covered by the law because their disclosure would harm borrowers' competitive positions... The judge said, that the Federal Reserve MUST identify the companies in its emergency lending programs..."

"...
here's where I make sure you understand the difference between China adding economic stimulus, and the U.S. adding economic stimulus... China has the treasure chest of reserves to do so, and the U.S. doesn't! They are working from a position of monetary strength... The U.S. on the other hand, has done a wonderful job of jacking up the national debt! And we still have 1 in 5 people unemployed! We still have banks failing left and right, 77 of them in 2009, and we still have an economy in depression..."

Ron Paul - Texas Talk

I'd like more teeth in this - make it part of swearing in oath that all will read every bill to be voted up on its' entirety before vote. - MBC

http://www.house.gov/htbin/blog_inc?BLOG,tx14_paul,blog,999,All,Item%20not%20found,ID=090824_3501,TEMPLATE=postingdetail.shtml

We Need Sunlight to Disinfect the Legislative Process!

During August recess, many legislators have heard an unexpected amount of discontent from their constituents about what is happening on Capitol Hill, particularly regarding healthcare. Some people are justifiably terrified at what the government could do to healthcare, should it get its claws even further into it. Others demand a public option for health insurance and are adamant that healthcare be treated as yet another absolute entitlement. One thing everyone agrees on is that the final bill needs to be read and understood by all legislators before a vote is taken. To any American, this is common sense. In Washington, that is unlikely to happen.

There is much confusion and debate over what is and is not in the reform plan being considered. Are there or are there not so-called death panels? What are the end-of-life consultations really for? How will private insurance be affected? Can you keep your current plan or will you eventually be forced into a government plan? Will it pay for elective abortions or not? What are the implications for medical privacy? The truth is no one knows what will be in the final bill until it is on the House floor, and provisions could be added in and taken out in the wee hours of the morning before.

In February, the House was forced to vote on an over 1,000 page “stimulus” bill that had first been posted on the internet just after midnight the morning of the vote. It passed. Then in June, House leaders rushed a vote on the cap-and-trade bill, even though an over 300 page “manager’s amendment” making substantive changes to the bill, was introduced shortly after 3:00 a.m. the morning of the vote.

Washington thrives on crisis. If enough people can be convinced that we are in an emergency, they will more likely tolerate rushing legislation to the floor like this. Last minute changes will be slipped in, benefitting who knows what special interests and at what expense to the taxpayer. But the mantra is repeated over and over: We are in a crisis. We must act immediately.

It should be unconscionable for legislators to vote in favor of legislation they have not had the opportunity to read. This is why I have re-introduced the Sunlight Rule, H.Res 216. The Sunlight Rule prohibits any piece of legislation from being brought before the House of Representatives unless it has been available to read for at least 10 days.

The Sunlight Rule allows citizens to move for censure of any House Member who votes for a bill in violation of this act. Because the Sunlight Rule could never be waived, any Member could raise a point of order requiring any bill in violation to be immediately pulled from the House calendar until it can be brought to the floor in a manner consistent with this rule. This rule does not require that Members read the bills. It merely guarantees the opportunity to do so. It has 4 cosponsors.

Justice Louis Brandeis famously said, “Sunlight is the best disinfectant.” The Sunlight Rule would do much towards negating the cycle of pseudo-crises and cleaning up the legislative process here in Washington. I sincerely hope this is the year Congress remembers its deliberative duties and passes it.

We saved the world from disaster

The parts of this I find most telling; "...His history of the crisis essentially begins in September 2008, and ignores the actions and decisions that led to disaster. Of the origins of the crisis, Bernanke's only remark was that, until just before the crisis, "there was little to suggest that market participants saw the financial situation as about to take a sharp turn for the worse."..."

"...He said nothing about how the Fed would unwind its support for the banking system. That day seems to be in the distant future, however. "Although we have avoided the worst, difficult challenges still lie ahead,' including securing a sustainable economic recovery and rebuilding the institutional framework to make sure a similar crisis can be averted..."

Now I have serious trouble buying into this whole thing from a guy who didn't see it coming and who doesn't have a presentable plan for securing a sustainable economic recovery. - MBC

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/we-saved-the-world-from-disaster-bernanke-says-2009-08-21-10100

Monday, August 24, 2009

Daily Pfenning - 8-24-09

http://www.dailypfennig.com/

"...It seems the US government is intent on getting consumers to go back to their borrow and spend habits. This is what created the bubbles, and the administration seems intent on creating another bubble economy. US consumers have made some historic cut backs on the amount of debt they are amassing (whether or not these cutbacks are by choice). The US government should not be encouraging these consumers to go back to their previous ways, but should instead be trying to use the funds to educate and train consumers and to encourage new and innovative companies. Use this downturn to correct some of the bad habits which we had gotten into. Yes, it will be painful, but breaking an addiction is always hard and painful. US consumers need to break our addiction to easy credit and massive debt. This recession/depression has given consumers a much needed wake up call, hopefully the administration won't be able to push consumers back into their old habits..."

"...Nouriel Roubini wrote a commentary in today's Financial Times which agrees with my thoughts. Roubini said the chance of a double dip recession is increasing because of risks related to ending global monetary and fiscal stimulus. He believes the global economy still has further to fall, and will bottom out sometime during the second half of 2009. While some economies such as China, Germany, Australia, and France will likely recover; others such as the US and UK will double dip with another leg down. "There are risks associated with exit strategies from the massive monetary and fiscal easing," Roubini wrote. "Policy makers are damned if they do and damned if they don't."


"...dollar's role as the world's reserve currency has been a continued topic among scholars and was undoubtedly discussed out in Jackson hole last week. China and Russia have both been adamant about discussing the possibility of moving toward a new reserve system to replace the greenback. Since no single currency is strong enough to replace the dollar in today's global economy, most discussion has centered around the idea of creating a 'reserve currency' which is comprised of a basket of the world's largest currencies. This idea is supported by Joseph Stiglitz, a Nobel Prize winning economist and Columbia University economics professor. "The dollar's role as a good store of value is questionable and the currency has a high degree of risk," Stiglitz said at a conference last Friday. "There is a need for a global reserve system. The currency reserve system is in the process of fraying," Stiglitz said. "The dollar is not a good store of value."

"...Frank Trotter was thinking about the same thing...

"Went to the touring musical Mary Poppins Saturday night; it's always great to see a play about a run on a bank. While the books were written in the 1930's and beyond most of you will remember the Disney film set in 1910 - before the Great War when England ruled the waves and empire was returning untold dividends to the mother country. At that time of course there was no questioning the power, status and earning capacity of the British Empire. As George Banks replies to Admiral Boom in the movie, "Credit rates are moving up, up, up. And the British pound is the admiration of the world."

Well that was then and this is now. Soon after, in 1914 England suspended the conversion of Bank of England notes to gold for the period surrounding World War I, and the on again off again slide into today's fiat currency world began. Over the next 100 years England has leaned the lesson of empires that came before. That extending the resources of a country in non-producing capacity leads to the decline of the currency and a fall in the economic power of the country and the economic wellbeing of it's population. In 1910 it took 4.25 pounds to buy an ounce of gold, and 0.2056 pounds to buy a US dollar. Today of course the price of gold has risen 13,447% for British buyers, while the price of a greenback is only up 195%. We are uncomfortably comfortable in feeling that the carabineers have given way for the good old USA in a parallel fashion.

We'll freely admit that there has been a slow motion slide going on in the US dollar since establishment, and especially since the removal from the gold standard and the Bretton Woods Agreement in 1971. But we feel even more strongly that the fiscal and monetary policies put in place starting in 2001, accelerating through the 2000's, and now amplified since January 20th have left us with no legs for our stool. Fiscal policy has been and continues to be out of control. The Federal Reserve policy of the 2000's created the credit bubble and now stands to create the largest monetary inflation experienced in a first world nation. Both political parties have determined that no one can be an adult in government by slashing spending or raising taxes to cover our exploding gap (mathematically the only two options), and instead are hiding behind the invisible tax of currency depreciation. For a country we conclude that a strong currency is essential to long term well being, and by extension that our government has given up on the dream in exchange for election and reelection.

So what's to be done? If you are a believer that the political process can sort things out and return our wonderful nation to fiscal prudence and steady governance go ahead and stay the course. For the rest of us who like Margaret Thatcher believe that "the problem with socialism is that eventually you run our of other people's money", we'll be letting our "tuppance safely invested in the bank" seek diversification across the globe in countries and markets with more opportunity and prudence. We couldn't agree more with the Mary Poppins conclusion, re-written for modern times that "Where stands the banks of [the USA], America stand. Oh, oh, oh, oh! When falls the banks of [the USA], America falls!"